Vol. 7, Issue 1, Part L (2025)

Layoffs can at times be a necessary evil to keep an organization afloat. Layoffs can also be planned and implemented strategically to minimize their physical and psychological toll on all stakeholders. Using a qualitative discussion methodology with 20 working adult graduate researchers in the United States, this article examines the views, feelings, and recommendations of how Americans feel about the public sector layoffs, which were initiated by the Department of Government Efficiency (a.k.a. DOGE). While some respondents expressed full support for DOGE’s intention and purpose to enhance public sector efficiency, others are critical of how the layoffs have been initiated, communicated, and implemented. In their commentary, the respondents have provided specific actions they would take, had they overseen DOGE. Overall, this paper examined the pulse of America regarding the public sector layoffs and offers recommendations for how layoffs should be conducted and implemented.

Keeping one's finger on the pulse of America’s working adults regarding public sector layoffs is essential because these decisions have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond individual job losses. Public sector layoffs can disrupt critical government services, erode public trust, and disproportionately affect vulnerable communities that rely on those services. By staying attuned to public sentiment, economic trends, and the societal impact of such layoffs, policymakers and leaders can make more informed, compassionate decisions that balance efficiency with social responsibility. It also allows for early identification of unrest, morale issues, and unintended consequences to ensure that workforce changes are implemented thoughtfully and with accountability to the citizens they ultimately serve.